What is educational underachievement in sociology?

Underachievement describes a situation when educational performance is below what was expected or predicted.

What is educational underachievement?

What is Underachievement? In basic terms, underachievement is seen as a discrepancy between a student’s academic potential and how he or she is actually performing in school. This potential is often revealed through performance on intelligence and achievement tests, as well as observational data.

What causes underachievement in education?

Causes of underachievement Fear of failure, fear of success. Fear of lack of acceptance by peer group. Undetected learning disabilities. Lack of basic skills and study habits.

What are the major theories of sociology of education?

Today, sociologists and educators debate the function of education. Three main theories represent their views: the functionalist theory, the conflict theory, and the symbolic interactionist theory.

How does labeling cause underachievement?

Rosenthal and Jacobsen argued labels can result in a self-fulfilling prophecy – where if a teacher doesn’t expect much of a student, they internalise the label and it becomes true. If the above is true, it will explain why WC pupils underachieve in education compared to MC pupils.

What are the effects of underachievement?

This form of underachievement in school is damaging because it affects students’ self-esteem, can lead to school failure and keep students from reaching their full potential in school and later in life.

How do you deal with underachievement?

Six tips for dealing with underachievers

  1. Recognize that you, as supervisor, are in the best position to deal with your less-than-perfect performers.
  2. Deal with it head on.
  3. Verify his perspective.
  4. Check if you have the right tools in the tool chest.
  5. Determine if team players are playing well together.

Why theories are important in sociology of education?

Sociological theories help us to take various pieces of a puzzle and put them together, using a specific framework to help us make sense of it all and to give us the tools we need to talk about the “bigger picture.” Each theoretical perspective represents a particular way of understanding the social world.