What does the Milgram experiment say about authority?

In the study, an authority figure ordered participants to deliver what they believed were dangerous electrical shocks to another person. These results suggested that people are highly influenced by authority and obedience.

What was Milgram’s conclusion on obedience?

Milgram found that all of the real participants went to at least 300 volts and 65% continued until the full 450 volts. He concluded that under the right circumstances ordinary people will obey unjust orders.

Which of the following is true of Milgram’s 1963 and 1974 research on obedience to authority?

Which of the following is true of Milgram’s (1963, 1965, 1974) research on obedience to authority? With each increment of shock voltage, fewer participants obeyed, but about 65% still administered 450 volts (the highest level).

What results were concluded from Milgram’s shock experiment?

Milgram was horrified by the results of the experiment. In the “remote condition” version of the experiment described above, 65 percent of the subjects (26 out of 40) continued to inflict shocks right up to the 450-volt level, despite the learner’s screams, protests, and, at the 330-volt level, disturbing silence.

What ethical concerns have been raised regarding the Milgram obedience studies?

The ethical issues involved with the Milgram experiment are as follows: deception, protection of participants involved, and the right to withdrawal. The experiment was deemed unethical, because the participants were led to believe that they were administering shocks to real people.

What is true regarding the Milgram obedience Study?

Milgram debriefed all his participants straight after the experiment and disclosed the true nature of the experiment. Participants were assured that their behavior was common and Milgram also followed the sample up a year later and found that there were no signs of any long-term psychological harm.

Which statement best describes the concept of obedience as Milgram would define it?

The correct answer is c. People will easily obey an authority figure and do harm to others..

What was the motivation behind Stanley Milgram’s famous obedience experiment?

What was the motivation behind Stanley Milgram’s famous obedience experiment? A He had studied the Spanish American War and wanted to see if he could understand why it occurred.

How did Stanley Milgram test participants obedience to authority?

The Milgram experiment was carried out many times whereby Milgram (1965) varied the basic procedure (changed the IV). By doing this Milgram could identify which factors affected obedience (the DV). Obedience was measured by how many participants shocked to the maximum 450 volts (65% in the original study).

What was one of the key findings in Milgram’s study of obedience?

Milgram’s experiment demonstrated the power of authority and how someone in a position of authority can influence people to behave unethically and against their wishes.

Why did Milgram conduct his experiments on obedience?

The goal of the Milgram experiment was to test the extent of humans’ willingness to obey orders from an authority figure. Participants were told by an experimenter to administer increasingly powerful electric shocks to another individual. Unbeknownst to the participants, shocks were fake and the individual being shocked was an actor.

Was Milgram ethical in his obedience studies?

This code of ethics was laid upon Stanley Milgram, weather or not he followed them is another story. Diane Baumrind, a celebrated psychologist, believes that Milgram was extremely unethical during his obedience study.

What was the ethics of Milgram’s obedience experiment?

The ethical issues involved with the Milgram experiment are as follows: deception, protection of participants involved, and the right to withdrawal. The experiment was deemed unethical, because the participants were led to believe that they were administering shocks to real people.

Why do we obey authority?

Collective Security. When individuals respect the authority of social norms or the law,it assures mutual security.

  • Individual Safety. Authority figures often establish rules to protect the safety of the individual.
  • Avoiding Negative Consequences.
  • Mantaining Order.