What is an example of moral relativism?
What is an example of moral relativism?
Relativists often do claim that an action/judgment etc. is morally required of a person. For example, if a person believes that abortion is morally wrong, then it IS wrong — for her. In other words, it would be morally wrong for Susan to have an abortion if Susan believed that abortion is always morally wrong.
What is not a reason for supporting ethical relativism?
Terms in this set (25) Social or cultural relativism holds that what is right is whatever one’s society or culture holds is right. Which is not a reason for supporting ethical relativism? If people disagree about some moral matter, their disagreement will always be due to their having different moral values.
Is relativism right or wrong?
Ethical relativism is the theory that holds that morality is relative to the norms of one’s culture. That is, whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced. The same action may be morally right in one society but be morally wrong in another.
What do you think are the problems of moral diversity?
The problem begins with the fact of moral diversity: different cultures have different moral codes. Of course, it’s not just between different national cultures that moral opinions differ; the same can happen between different subcultures of the same national culture.
Why does moral relativism fail to support the idea of tolerance?
When people argue for tolerance, they normally have in mind a universal, objective principle of tolerance. That is why relativism can’t adequately support tolerance because if relativism were true, there could not be universal, objective moral principles.
Is ethical relativism is a positive or negative?
Each version of ethical relativism, then, is composed of both a negative and a positive element—the negative claim that there are no absolute or objective ethical truths and a positive account of that to which ethical truths are relative.
What is moral relativism in your own words?
Moral relativism is the idea that there is no universal or absolute set of moral principles. It’s a version of morality that advocates “to each her own,” and those who follow it say, “Who am I to judge?”
What are the two types of moral relativism?
Relativistic positions may specifically see moral values as applicable only within certain cultural boundaries (Cultural Relativism) or in the context of individual preferences (Ethical Subjectivism).
Which do you think among the arguments that support ethical relativism is the strongest Why?
Perhaps the strongest argument against ethical relativism comes from those who assert that universal moral standards can exist even if some moral practices and beliefs vary among cultures.
What is moral relativism?
Moral relativism is the idea that there are no absolute rules to determine whether something is right or wrong.
