What was the result of the Valladolid debate?

In the end, while both parties declared that they had won the debate, neither received the outcome they desired. Las Casas did not see the end to Spanish wars of conquest in the New World, and Sepúlveda did not see the New Laws’ restrictions on the power of the encomienda system overturned.

Why was the Valladolid debate important?

And second, and more important to the context of world in U.S. history, the Valladolid debate was the first European debate about the morality of European colonization of new lands, and not only the colonization of those lands, but how the populations in those new lands should be treated.

Who took part in the Valladolid debate?

1 Background. The Valladolid debate (1550–1551) had as its main protagonists the Dominican Bartolomé de las Casas, bishop of Chiapas, and the humanist Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda, royal chronicler to the emperor Charles V.

How long did the Valladolid debate last?

The Valladolid Debate (1550–1551) was a moral debate in the heyday of the Spanish Empire where the rights and treatment of indigenous people in the Americas were discussed by two opposing sides.

What was Sepulveda’s argument?

Sepulveda rationalized Spanish treatment of American Indians by arguing that Indians were “natural slaves” and that Spanish presence in the New World would benefit them.

What was the main argument between Bartolome de las Casas and Sepulveda?

Sepulveda argued against Las Casas on behalf of the colonists’ property rights. Sepulveda rationalized Spanish treatment of American Indians by arguing that Indians were “natural slaves” and that Spanish presence in the New World would benefit them.

Who was Valladolid debate between?

What is the Black Legend and why is it false?

The Black Legend was apparently the product of an understandable revulsion against the monstrous crimes committed in the Americas by the Spanish conquistadors. But even a minimal respect for historical truth shows that this is simply false. Of course there were crimes, and monstrous crimes at that.

What is the White legend?

A set of pro-Hispanic ideas attempting to counterbalance the anti-Hispanic Black Legend (Spanish Leyenda Negra).

How did Sepulveda justify enslaving natives?

The text justified theoretically following Aristotelian ideas of natural slavery the inferiority of Indians and their enslavement by the Spaniards. He claimed that the Indians had no ruler, and no laws, so any civilized man could legitimately appropriate them.

Is the Black Legend still alive?

The Black Legend remained particularly strong in the United States throughout the 19th century. It was kept alive by the Mexican War of 1846 and the subsequent need to deal with a Spanish-speaking but mixed-race population within its borders.