What is the significance of Muller v. Oregon quizlet?

A supreme court case decided in 1908 that pertained to the working hours of women. The court ruled in favor of Oregon, that these restrictions were legal under the state laws to protect women’s health.

What impact did the Muller v. Oregon decision have on the women’s rights movement?

State of Oregon, U.S. Supreme Court case decided in 1908 that, although it appeared to promote the health and welfare of female workers, in fact led to additional protective legislation that was detrimental to equality in the workplace for years to come.

Was Muller v. Oregon was a victory for women’s rights?

On February 24, 1908, the Supreme Court decided Muller v. Oregon, unanimously upholding an Oregon law setting a 10-hour limit on the workday of women in factories and laundries. The Muller decision was a major victory for rising progressive lawyer Louis D. Brandeis because it upheld protective state regulations.

What was the significance of the Brandeis brief?

The brief was significant in that it was the first one submitted to the Supreme Court that relied primarily on extra-legal data to prove its argument. Not only did the brief help Brandeis win the case but it also became a legal landmark in its own right.

What was the main argument of each side in Muller v Oregon?

In Muller vs. Oregon, a laundry owner argued that limiting women to a ten-hour work day was an unconstitutional violation of their right to choose their own employment. Due in large part to a unique legal brief by Louis Brandeis, the Supreme Court concluded that the states could limit the working hours of women.

Who was responsible for Muller v Oregon?

Curt Muller
Curt Muller, the owner of a laundry business, was convicted of violating Oregon labor laws by making a female employee work more than ten hours in a single day. Muller was fined $10.

What was so revolutionary about the legal brief by Louis Brandeis Muller v Oregon?

Brandeis’ brief for the case — Muller v. Oregon — was the first to use sociological data in addition to legal arguments to address the question of whether excess labor led to ill health among workers. Dubbed the Brandeis Brief, it served as a model for future cases where non-legal data was used to argue a case.

What was the significance of the Brandeis Brief that Louis Brandeis submitted to the US Supreme Court to support his work on the Muller v Oregon case in 1908?

The Brandeis brief changed the direction of the Supreme Court and of U.S. law. It is considered a model for future Supreme Court presentations in cases affecting the health or welfare of classes of individuals. This strategy of combining legal argument with scientific evidence was later successfully used in Brown v.

Why did Kurt Muller claim the Oregon labor law was unconstitutional?

Muller claimed that the charges violated his right to freely contract under the US Constitution. During this case, the question of if the law passed violated the women equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.