What does santhara mean?

A way of life The word Santhara means a way of life and encompasses a way of dying as well. In Jainism, the body is seen as a temporary residence for the soul which is reborn.

What is the practice of santhara?

Santhara refers to the practice of decreasing the intake of food and water gradually in order to end ones life and attain moksha. The Honble Rajasthan high court has banned this practice stating that it is equivalent to attempt to suicide. Apparently supreme court has declared a stay on the judgment.

What is difference between santhara and sallekhana?

In case of santhara, there is a spiritual purpose – it is for self-purification, for self-realisation, and for the uplift of soul,” says Mr Bhandari. “In case of sallekhana the purpose is self-purification; purity of soul; it is for penance.

Is sallekhana legal in India?

In 2015, the Rajasthan High Court banned the practice, considering it suicide. In 2016, the Supreme Court of India stayed the decision of the Rajasthan High Court and lifted the ban on sallekhana.

What is santhara order?

Santhara a component of non-violence: SC. RELIGIOUS PRACTICE: Santhara is a Jain ritual of fasting unto death. NOT CONSULTED: The Supreme Court said that Jain scholars were not consulted by the High Court before it criminalised the practice.

What is sagari santhara?

A: Sanlekhna Santhara is a Jain religious practice of voluntarily embracing death. It is a ritual aimed at self-purification by shedding of Karma. It is being ready to accept death when it comes.

Is santhara essential religious practice?

We do not find that in any of the scriptures, preachings, articles or the practices followed by the Jain ascetics, the Santhara or Sallekhana has been treated as an essential religious practice, nor is necessarily required for the pursuit of immortality or moksha.

What happens after Diksha in Jain?

“Once you take deeksha or renounce the world, your level of spirituality, social standing, religious standing becomes so high, even the richest man will come down and bow to you,” he added.

What is Shirur Mutt case?

In the Shirur Mutt case (1954), it was held that the term “religion” will cover all rituals and practices “integral” to a religion. The SC took upon itself the responsibility of determining what is integral.

What happens when someone takes diksha?

What do Jain nuns do during menstruation?

“Except in Mumbai, Jain nuns don’t use bathrooms. Water shouldn’t be wasted at all. They don’t have a bath throughout their life,” says Jain. “During menstruation, they usually sit in a container of water on the fourth day, taking care that the water is later spilled on Earth.

What is doctrine of essentiality?

In the legal framework, the doctrine of essentiality is a doctrine that has evolved to protect the religious practices that are essential or integral and does not violate any fundamental right. India being a secular country has discrete religious beliefs and to deny any is to violate the freedom of religion.

What is Santhara case in Jainism?

Santhara case: Supreme Court had stayed Rajasthan HC judgment which branded Jainism’s centuries Old ‘Santhara or Sallekhaan’ custom as attempt to suicide warranting prosecution under section 306 of Indian penal code. What is Santhara? Santhara is a supplementary vow to the ethical code of conduct of Jainism.

What is Santhara and how is it followed?

Santhara is followed with the practice of taking vows strictly such as daily routine prayers, fasting until death; avoid thinking about the desire for live, for death and even to remember the pleasures delighted by him in the past as well as the pleasures he is going to enjoy in the future.

Is Santhara a punishable offence?

Therefore the High Court declared Santhara as a punishable offence. And hence this is leading to conflicts and differentiation of thoughts and interpretation of law in the public and in the courts. In the case of Durgah Committee v.

Does Santhara violate right to life under Article 25?

Even if Santhara forms an essential part of Jain religion still it cannot be allowed to infringe a basic principle of ‘Right to life’ when already Freedom of religion under Article 25 (1) is made subject to public order, morality and health.