What are the 4 basic philosophies of punishment?

Major punishment philosophies include retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, incapacitation, and restoration.

What are the theories of punishment in philosophy?

There are majorly four theories of punishment. These theories are the deterrent theory, retributive theory, preventive theory, and reformative theory.

What is the utilitarian theory of punishment?

The utilitarian theory of punishment seeks to punish offenders to discourage, or “deter,” future wrongdoing. The retributive theory seeks to punish offenders because they deserve to be punished. Under the utilitarian philosophy, laws should be used to maximize the happiness of society.

What are the two broad theories of punishment?

The Retributive Theory of Punishment, or the ‘Theory of Vengeance’, as many people in the society would perceive it as, is the most basic, yet inconsiderate theory of inflicting a penal sentence over a perpetrator.

What is the consequentialist approach to punishment?

The consequentialist approach does try to intervene on this issue by adjusting its approach in concentrating punishment solely on the offender, by redirecting ‘pain’ to fall on the offender. It still does not completely remove the issue of being proportionate to the crime committed.

What is a consequence consequentialist theory?

Consequentialism is an ethical theory that judges whether or not something is right by what its consequences are. For instance, most people would agree that lying is wrong.

What are the main concepts of pure consequentialism?

The pure consequentialist theory provides four main concepts in which it acts to punish an individual who has committed a crime. The concepts cover incapacitation, deterrence, reform and rehabilitation.

Should moral theory be classified as consequentialist?

Several philosophers assert that a moral theory should not be classified as consequentialist unless it is agent-neutral (McNaughton and Rawling 1991, Howard-Snyder 1994, Pettit 1997). This narrower definition is motivated by the fact that many self-styled critics of consequentialism argue against agent-neutrality.