Is RequireJS obsolete?

requirejs or other AMD based loaders are still good if you have some pretty old vanilla JS, they still work well. If you are developing some new UI/JS app you can use webpack.

Is RequireJS AMD?

On the other hand, RequireJS implements AMD, which is designed to suit the browser environment (source). Apparently, AMD started as a spinoff of the CommonJS Transport format and evolved into its own module definition API.

What is the main purpose of the RequireJS framework?

RequireJS is a JavaScript library and file loader which manages the dependencies between JavaScript files and in modular programming. It also helps to improve the speed and quality of the code.

What is the difference between AMD and CommonJS?

In fact, AMD was split from CommonJS early in its development. The main difference between AMD and CommonJS lies in its support for asynchronous module loading. “The main difference between AMD and CommonJS lies in its support for asynchronous module loading.”

What are ES modules?

As of ES6 (ES2015), JavaScript supports a native module format called ES Modules, or ECMAScript Modules. This is modern way to do modules in JavaScript. This approach uses the export and import keywords, instead of the older CommonJS syntax of module. exports and require .

Is RequireJS synchronous?

So, RequireJS doesn’t support it. From your use case it seems that you don’t need synchronous RequireJS, you need to return result asynchronously. AMD pattern allows to define dependencies and load them asynchronously, but module’s factory function must return result synchronously.

What is difference between require and define in RequireJS?

The require() function is used to run immediate functionalities, while define() is used to define modules for use in multiple locations. In our example we need to run the purchaseProduct() function immediately. So, require() was used inside main.

Do browsers understand CommonJS?

The module. exports object is really specific to NodeJS. The commonJS team created this API as a synchronous one which is not that good for browsers… Moreover, Commonjs isn’t natively understood by browsers; it requires either a loader library or some transpiling.

Is ES modules better than CommonJS?

js projects, ES modules provide an alternative to CommonJS. The ES modules format does offer an easier route to writing isomorphic JavaScript, which can run in either the browser or on a server.