What is autotelic in New Criticism?
What is autotelic in New Criticism?
New Criticism Tends to Emphasize: The text as an autotelic artifact, something complete with in itself, written for its own sake, unified in its form and not dependent on its relation to the author’s life or intent, history, or anything else. The formal and technical properties of work of art.
Who coined the term autotelic text?
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi describes people who are internally driven, and who as such may exhibit a sense of purpose and curiosity, as autotelic.
How can you say that text is autotelic?
Such a text that contains meaning within itself is humanist and renders itself to close reading, based on formal devices such as irony, ambiguity, paradox, rhythm or syntax, as explained by William Empson (The Seven Types of Ambiguity, 1930),-FR Leavis (articles in Scrutiny), Cleanth Brooks (“Language of Paradox”), and …
What is affective fallacy in literary criticism?
affective fallacy, according to the followers of New Criticism, the misconception that arises from judging a poem by the emotional effect that it produces in the reader.
What is the meaning of the word autotelic?
having a purpose in
Definition of autotelic : having a purpose in and not apart from itself.
What is theory of impersonality?
In the theory of Impersonality, the poetic development is the continuous subtraction and diminishing of poet’s personality and emotions. The poet’s personality and subjectivity is considered less important because a poet can only attain tradition / historical sense through objective sensibility.
What is meant by autotelic?
Definition of autotelic : having a purpose in and not apart from itself.
Which is known as autotelic activity?
An autotelic activity is one we do for its own sake because to experience it is the main goal. [ ] Applied to personality, autotelic denotes an individual who generally does things for their own sake, rather than in order to achieve some later external goal” (Csikszentmihalyi, 1997, p. 117).
What is an example of affective fallacy?
And here’s why: In literary criticism, the affective fallacy refers to incorrectly judging a piece of writing by how it emotionally affects its reader. In other words, if you think a poem about a three-legged puppy is poignant because it makes you bawl your eyes out, you’re wrong.
What is Wimsatt affective fallacy elaborate?
Affective fallacy is a term from literary criticism used to refer to the supposed error of judging or evaluating a text on the basis of its emotional effects on a reader. The term was coined by W.K. Wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley as a principle of New Criticism.
What is the opposite of autotelic?
Antonyms. (containing its own meaning or purpose): non-autotelic, nonautotelic.
