What is a counter plan in debate?

While some conceptions of debate theory require the negative position in a debate to defend the status quo against an affirmative position or plan, a counterplan allows the negative to defend a separate plan or an advocacy. It also allows the affirmative to run disadvantages against the negative.

What is a Kritik debate?

A kritik (from the German Kritik, meaning “critique” or “criticism”) is a form of argument in policy debate that challenges a certain mindset or assumption made by the opposing team, often from the perspective of critical theory.

What are the three types of Inherency?

Structural inherency: Laws or other barriers to the implementation of the plan or causes of harms. Attitudinal inherency: Beliefs or attitudes which prevent the implementation of the plan or causing harms. Existential inherency: The harms exist and res ipsa loquitur, the status quo must not be able to solve the problem …

What is counter planning?

1 : a plan designed to counter another plan. 2 : an alternate or substitute plan.

How does a policy debate work?

Policy debate is an American form of debate competition in which teams of two usually advocate for and against a resolution that typically calls for policy change by the United States federal government.

What is an example of topicality?

Topicality arguments claim that the plan presented by the affirmative does not fit within the bounds of the resolution. For example, if the affirmative only increases education spending by $1, the negative will argue that it is not a substantial increase.

How do you write a debate Kritik?

It can actually be as simple as saying, “The aff/neg team said/did X.” Kritik links vary from things endorsed in the case or speech (ex. “They read a hegemony advantage!”) or things said or done in round (ex. “They said ‘you guys’ to us during cross-ex!”).

How does policy debate work?

What is a structure of a debate?

Structure for Debate A formal debate usually involves three groups: one supporting a resolution (affirmative team), one opposing the resolution (opposing team), and those who are judging the quality of the evidence and arguments and the performance in the debate.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTtqKXRoy10