What is the purpose of the Proslogion?

discussed in biography. His Proslogion (“Address” or “Allocution”), originally titled Fides quaerens intellectum (“Faith Seeking Understanding”), established the ontological argument for the existence of God.

What is the difference between the Monologion and the Proslogion?

Unlike Anselm’s first treatise, the Monologion (1076), which is based on an explicitly rational method, the Proslogion is a devotional exercise in which the person who speaks attempts to elevate his or her mind to the contemplation of God in prayer.

What is the conclusion of Anselm’s argument in chapter 2 of the Proslogion?

In Chapter 2 of the Proslogion, Anselm defined God as a “being than which no greater can be conceived”. He suggested that even “the fool” can understand this concept, and this understanding itself means that the being must exist in the mind.

What is Anselm’s version of the ontological argument?

Anselm claims to derive the existence of God from the concept of a being than which no greater can be conceived. St. Anselm reasoned that, if such a being fails to exist, then a greater being—namely, a being than which no greater can be conceived, and which exists—can be conceived.

How do you cite a Proslogion?

Citation Data

  1. MLA. Anselm, Saint, Archbishop of Canterbury, 1033-1109. St. Anselm’s Proslogion. Oxford :Clarendon Press, 1965.
  2. APA. Anselm, Saint, Archbishop of Canterbury, 1033-1109. ( 1965). St. Anselm’s Proslogion.
  3. Chicago. Anselm, Saint, Archbishop of Canterbury, 1033-1109. St. Anselm’s Proslogion.

What is Anselm’s definition of God?

Anselm begins with a stipulative definition of “God” as “a being than which no greater being can be conceived.” The argument of Proslogium (Ch. II): (1) God exists in the understanding but not in reality. (Supposition) (2) Existence in reality is greater than existence in the understanding alone.

What is Saint Anselm’s argument for the existence of God?

Is the ontological argument successful?

There is no real evidence to show God’s existence and some statements are poor (such as existence being predicate). Therefore the Ontological Argument is unsuccessful in proving God’s existence.

Why the ontological argument fails?

If Kant’s view is correct then The Ontological Argument fails, if existence is not a real predicate that is added on to the subject then to deny existence you take away the whole subject. The principle of the Ontological Argument regards this as being as an attribute.

What is Anselm known for?

Saint Anselm was one of the most important Christian thinkers of the eleventh century. He is most famous in philosophy for having discovered and articulated the so-called “ontological argument;” and in theology for his doctrine of the atonement.