What was the majority opinion in Shaw v Reno?

In the decision, the court ruled in a 5–4 majority that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause and on the basis that it violated the fourteenth Amendment because it was drawn solely based on race. Ruth O. Shaw, et al., Appellants v.

What was the court’s ruling in Shaw v Reno?

Supreme Court of the United StatesShaw v. Reno / Ruling courtThe Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, as well as over state court cases that involve a point of federal law. Wikipedia

Which Supreme Court case outlawed racial gerrymandering?

Johnson. Miller v. Johnson, 515 U.S. 900 (1995), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning “affirmative gerrymandering/racial gerrymandering”, where racial minority-majority electoral districts are created during redistricting to increase minority Congressional representation.

When was Shaw v Reno decided?

1993Shaw v. Reno / Date decided

Was there a dissenting opinion in Baker v Carr?

The Court split 6 to 2 in ruling that Baker’s case was justiciable, producing, in addition to the opinion of the Court by Justice William J. Brennan, three concurring opinions and two dissenting opinions.

Which of the following correctly describes the facts in Shaw v Reno 1993?

Which of the following correctly describes the facts in Shaw v. Reno (1993)? Redistricting in order to confine minority voters to a majority in one district was challenged under the Fourteenth Amendment.

What is the point of Justice Harlan’s dissenting opinion?

Harlan, in his dissent, clung to Radical Republican tenets and argued that the victims were not asking for special privileges but were seeking equal treatment with the majority race.

What was the majority opinion in Baker v Carr?

The outcome: The court ruled 6-2 in favor of the plaintiffs, finding that apportionment cases are justiciable (i.e., that federal courts have the right to intervene in such cases).

Which of the following most clearly states the outcome of Shaw v Reno 1993 )?

Which of the following most clearly states the outcome of Shaw v. Reno (1993)? Redistricting plans based on race must be held to a high standard of scrutiny under the Fourteenth Amendment and ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

What did the Supreme Court decide why did Justice Harlan disagree?

Perhaps his most famous dissenting opinion was in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), which upheld the constitutionality of segregation laws. Harlan was the sole justice on the Court to disagree. He wrote in his opinion, “Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens.