How was Sandra Lovelace affected by the Indian Act?
How was Sandra Lovelace affected by the Indian Act?
After marrying Bennie, Lovelace Nicholas lost her Indian status, as conferred by the Indian Act. When her marriage ended, she returned to the reserve but, since she was no longer a registered Indian, the Tobique band council refused to give her a subsidized house on their land.
What legal document did Sandra Lovelace site was violated when she lost her Indian status?
Sandra Lovelace was born and registered as a Maliseet Indian but lost her rights and status as such in accordance with section 12(1)(b) of Canada’s Indian Act after she married a non-Indian in 1970.
What legal document did Sandra Lovelace site?
It has to be considered whether Sandra Lovelace, because she is denied the legal right to reside dn the Tobique Reserve, has by that fact been denied the right guaranteed by article 27 to persons belonging to minorities, to enjoy their own culture and to use their own language in community with other members of their …
What is Bill c31?
Bill C-31, or a Bill to Amend the Indian Act, passed into law in April 1985 to bring the Indian Act into line with gender equality under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
What did the red paper do?
The Red Paper held strongly against assimilation and argued that Indian people had signed the historical treaties with the Crown as equals, and that the treaties were sacred and that promises made in the treaties were everlasting.
Who wrote the red paper?
The Red Paper strongly defended treaty rights and Indigenous rights to lands, public services and self-determination. Cardinal authored two strongly critical statements on Indigenous policy in Canada, The Unjust Society (1969) and The Rebirth of Canada’s Indians (1977).
What did the legal cases of Lavell and Lovelace v Canada address?
By taking on the Canadian state, Jeannette Corbiere Lavell, Sandra Lovelace and Yvonne Bédard directly contributed to section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, which was amended in 1983 to guarantee that Aboriginal and treaty rights would be equally accessible to men and women under the law.
What was the aim of the White Paper?
The federal government’s intention, as described in the white paper, was to achieve equality among all Canadians by eliminating Indian as a distinct legal status and by regarding Aboriginal peoples simply as citizens with the same rights, opportunities and responsibilities as other Canadians.
What was wrong with Bill C-31?
Problems with Bill C-31 By placing women who regained status, and often their children, onto the band membership lists of First Nations, the federal government stretched already limited lands and funds to serve more people. This has, at times, caused resentment and backlash toward these people by First Nations members.
Can Métis apply for Indian status?
The Indian Act applies only to status Indians, and has not historically recognized Métis and Inuit peoples. As a result, the Métis and Inuit have not had Indian status and the rights conferred by this status despite being Indigenous to Canada and participating in Canadian nation building.
Did Pierre Trudeau try to abolish the Indian Act?
In 1969, Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau and his Minister of Indian Affairs, Jean Chrétien, unveiled a policy paper that proposed ending the special legal relationship between Aboriginal peoples and the Canadian state and dismantling the Indian Act.
Why do they call it a white paper?
A white paper is an authoritative report or guide that often addresses issues and how to solve them. The term originated when government papers were coded by color to indicate distribution, with white designated for public access.