What did Laud Humphreys do that was considered unethical?
What did Laud Humphreys do that was considered unethical?
What did Laud Humphreys do that was considered unethical in his study of men who engage in sexual acts in public restrooms? He disguised himself and did follow-up research on the men by pretending to be conducting a medical survey.
What two principles did Humphrey’s violate?
Two principles that Humphreys violated are voluntary participation and informed consent.
What principle did the tearoom trade study violate?
Laud Humphrey’s Tearoom Trade Study •Deception was used in this case study and represents violating the principle of voluntary consent. The researcher did not expose his true identity and posed as another person, pretending to be something he was not and a lookout person.
What methods did Laud Humphreys use?
dissertation at Washington University, Humphreys set out to answer this question by means of participant observation and structured interview. He stationed himself in “tearooms” and offered to serve as “watchqueen” – the individual who keeps watch and coughs when a police car stops nearby or a stranger approaches.
What was the aim of the tearoom trade study?
In the 1970’s, sociology doctoral student Laud Humphreys conducted the infamous Tearoom Trade Study [2]. Humphreys’ goal was to understand why so many men at that time were having anonymous sexual encounters with other men in public restrooms.
What part of Laud Humphreys research was participant observation?
Which part of Laud Humphreys’s research was participant observation? Acting as a “watch queen” while observing them.
Why was the tearoom trade study unethical?
Humphreys’ study has been criticized on ethical grounds in that he observed acts of homosexuality by masquerading as a voyeur, did not get his subjects’ consent, used their license plate numbers to track them down, and interviewed them in disguise without revealing the true intent of his studies (he claimed to be a …
What are the 3 principles identified in the Belmont Report and what do they mean?
The principle of respect for persons is interpreted to mean that researchers should, if possible, receive informed consent from participants, and the Belmont Report identifies three elements of informed consent: information, comprehension, and voluntariness.
